linux-kernel - Re: Is SKAS still required for UML

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87ej46ybd0.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix>
Date:	Sat, 30 Aug 2008 12:46:03 +0100
From:	Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk>
To:	Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
Cc:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Is SKAS still required for UML

On 27 Aug 2008, Jeff Dike stated:
> SKAS3 is still a significant performance boost.

Nobody's forward-ported it to recent kernels that I can see, though :/

-- 
`Not even vi uses vi key bindings for its command line.' --- PdS
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/