lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:07:08 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>,
	Dario Faggioli <raistlin@...ux.it>,
	Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] sched: disabled rt-bandwidth by default


* Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au> wrote:

> There is no customer issue and there is no handwaving about 
> compliance;

well, the reason i'm asking is that i cannot for anything in the world 
imagine you being so upset about _anything_ but something that involves 
benchmark runs ;-)

And what does SCHED_FIFO RT policy scheduling have to do with 
performance and benchmarks? Nothing usually in the real world, except 
for this little known fact: a common 'tuning' for TPC database 
benchmarks is to run all DB threads as SCHED_FIFO to squeeze the last 
0.1% of performance out of the setup.

So - and i'm taking an educated guess here - is SCHED_FIFO+TPC 
performance perhaps one of the factors that played a role in you 
initiating this thread? If yes then it's obviously an incredibly broken 
use of SCHED_FIFO and we can add the sysctl tuning to the long list of 
dozens of other tunings that happen before a TPC run anyway.

Hm?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ