linux-kernel - Re: Cleanup and updates of x86 CPU definitions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <48B70660.5020003@goop.org>
Date:	Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:11:12 -0700
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC:	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Austin Zhang <austin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Cleanup and updates of x86 CPU definitions

H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> +#define X86_FEATURE_VMX		(4*32+ 5) /* Hardware virtualization */
> +#define X86_FEATURE_SMX		(4*32+ 6) /* "Safer" mode */
>   
Is this supposed to appear as "Safer" in /proc/cpuinfo?  Or should this
be ``Safer''?

    J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/