[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48B7090C.3030506@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:22:36 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC: the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Austin Zhang <austin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Cleanup and updates of x86 CPU definitions
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> +#define X86_FEATURE_VMX (4*32+ 5) /* Hardware virtualization */
>> +#define X86_FEATURE_SMX (4*32+ 6) /* "Safer" mode */
>>
> Is this supposed to appear as "Safer" in /proc/cpuinfo? Or should this
> be ``Safer''?
It was a dumb-ass thinko on my part (already fixed in tip:x86/cpu).
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists