linux-kernel - Re: [patch 02/03] USB: USB/IP: add client driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200808291023.27132.oliver@neukum.org>
Date:	Fri, 29 Aug 2008 10:23:26 +0200
From:	Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
To:	greg@...ah.com
Cc:	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Brian Merrell <bgmerrell@...ell.com>,
	Takahiro Hirofuchi <hirofuchi@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
	gregkh@...e.de
Subject: Re: [patch 02/03] USB: USB/IP: add client driver

Am Freitag 29 August 2008 01:00:35 schrieb greg@...ah.com:
> From: Takahiro Hirofuchi <hirofuchi@...rs.sourceforge.net>

> +			dum->port_status[rhport] |=
> +					(1 << USB_PORT_FEAT_C_SUSPEND);
> +			dum->port_status[rhport] &=
> +					~(1 << USB_PORT_FEAT_SUSPEND);
> +			dum->resuming = 0;
> +			dum->re_timeout = 0;
> +			/* if (dum->driver && dum->driver->resume) {
> +			 *	spin_unlock (&dum->lock);

I realise it is commented out, but still.

The resume method may sleep. It is documented as such. Thus it can
reenable interrupts. Therefore you can deadlock if you don't use irqrestore.


> +static void vhci_tx_urb(struct urb *urb)
> +{
> +	struct vhci_device *vdev = get_vdev(urb->dev);
> +	struct vhci_priv *priv;
> +	unsigned long flag;
> +
> +	if (!vdev) {
> +		err("could not get virtual device");
> +		/* BUG(); */
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&vdev->priv_lock, flag);
> +
> +	priv = kzalloc(sizeof(struct vhci_priv), GFP_ATOMIC);

There's no reason to hold the lock longer than necessary by
allocating memory in the lock section.

[..]
> +	wake_up(&vdev->waitq_tx);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vdev->priv_lock, flag);

again

> +static int vhci_urb_enqueue(struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct urb *urb,
> +			    gfp_t mem_flags)
> +{

This is called in the context of usb_submit_urb()

[..]
> +	ret = usb_hcd_link_urb_to_ep(hcd, urb);

This can fail for any urb due to urb->reject

> +	if (ret)
> +		goto no_need_unlink;

The branch would be taken

[..]
> +no_need_unlink:
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&the_controller->lock, flags);
> +
> +	usb_hcd_giveback_urb(vhci_to_hcd(the_controller), urb, urb->status);

This calls urb->complete. If the completion handler takes a spinlock
which is held when usb_submit_urb() was called, you deadlock.

> +static int vhci_urb_dequeue(struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct urb *urb, int status)

[..]
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&the_controller->lock, flags);
> +		usb_hcd_giveback_urb(vhci_to_hcd(the_controller), urb,
> +								urb->status);

This must be called with interrupts disabled.

> +		spin_lock_irqsave(&the_controller->lock, flags);
> +	}
> +
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&the_controller->lock, flags);
> +
> +	dbg_vhci_hc("leave\n");
> +	return 0;
> +}

	Regards
		Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/