linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] Remove cgroup member from struct page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <48BD0E4A.5040502@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:28:34 +0530
From:	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
CC:	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, hugh@...itas.com,
	menage@...gle.com, xemul@...nvz.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Remove cgroup member from struct page

KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 14:54:17 +0530
> Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
>> Nick Piggin wrote:
>>> That could be a reasonable solution.  Balbir has other concerns about
>>> this... so I think it is OK to try the radix tree approach first.
>> Thanks, Nick!
>>
>> Kamezawa-San, I would like to integrate the radix tree patches after review and
>> some more testing then integrate your patchset on top of it. Do you have any
>> objections/concerns with the suggested approach?
>>
> please show performance number first.

Yes, that is why said some more testing. I am running lmbench and kernbench on
it and some other tests, I'll get back with numbers.

-- 
	Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/