[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080902190723.841841f0.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 19:07:23 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, hugh@...itas.com,
menage@...gle.com, xemul@...nvz.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Remove cgroup member from struct page
On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:28:34 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 14:54:17 +0530
> > Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Nick Piggin wrote:
> >>> That could be a reasonable solution. Balbir has other concerns about
> >>> this... so I think it is OK to try the radix tree approach first.
> >> Thanks, Nick!
> >>
> >> Kamezawa-San, I would like to integrate the radix tree patches after review and
> >> some more testing then integrate your patchset on top of it. Do you have any
> >> objections/concerns with the suggested approach?
> >>
> > please show performance number first.
>
> Yes, that is why said some more testing. I am running lmbench and kernbench on
> it and some other tests, I'll get back with numbers.
>
A test which is not suffer much from I/O is better.
And please don't worry about my patches. I'll reschedule if yours goes first.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists