[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48BD119B.8020605@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:42:43 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
CC: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, hugh@...itas.com,
menage@...gle.com, xemul@...nvz.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Remove cgroup member from struct page
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:28:34 +0530
> Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>>> On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 14:54:17 +0530
>>> Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Nick Piggin wrote:
>>>>> That could be a reasonable solution. Balbir has other concerns about
>>>>> this... so I think it is OK to try the radix tree approach first.
>>>> Thanks, Nick!
>>>>
>>>> Kamezawa-San, I would like to integrate the radix tree patches after review and
>>>> some more testing then integrate your patchset on top of it. Do you have any
>>>> objections/concerns with the suggested approach?
>>>>
>>> please show performance number first.
>> Yes, that is why said some more testing. I am running lmbench and kernbench on
>> it and some other tests, I'll get back with numbers.
>>
> A test which is not suffer much from I/O is better.
> And please don't worry about my patches. I'll reschedule if yours goes first.
>
Thanks, I'll try and find the right set of tests.
--
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists