[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48BD117A.1080103@nttdata.co.jp>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:12:10 +0900
From: Kentaro Takeda <takedakn@...data.co.jp>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
CC: viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, miklos@...redi.hu, hch@...radead.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Toshiharu Harada <haradats@...data.co.jp>
Subject: Re: (repost) Confirmation of methods for calculating requested pathname.
> I don't know what Al Viro will say, but this is incredibly ugly.
> Even more ugly than previous patches.
Which approach did you mean by the "previous patches"?
* introduce security_path_* (new LSM hooks)
http://marc.info/?l=linux-security-module&m=120962139014606&w=2
* pass struct path * to vfs helper functions and existing LSM hooks
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/29/217
Regards,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists