[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080904101326.GD20055@kernel.dk>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 12:13:27 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Osterlund <petero2@...ia.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...il.com>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.27-rc4-git1: Reported regressions from 2.6.26
On Wed, Sep 03 2008, Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 09:26:43AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > Actually both interfaces are a fscking disaster. The right things to
> > > pass is neither and inode nor a file but a struct block_device. Al had
> > > all this work done a while and it just needs rebasing to a current tree:
> > >
> > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/viro/bdev.git;a=summary
> >
> > Completely agreed. Al, I remember talking to you about this at the
> > storage summit back in february. What are your current plans wrt moving
> > this forward?
>
> Rebased, with nfs parts of fmode_t patch taken out (irrelevant for
> bdev anyway and really better off in intent-killing queue). Other
> than that, it's a straight port... Same place, same branch.
So what's your plan with this - 2.6.28?
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists