[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080903020629.GS28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 03:06:29 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Osterlund <petero2@...ia.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...il.com>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.27-rc4-git1: Reported regressions from 2.6.26
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 09:26:43AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > Actually both interfaces are a fscking disaster. The right things to
> > pass is neither and inode nor a file but a struct block_device. Al had
> > all this work done a while and it just needs rebasing to a current tree:
> >
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/viro/bdev.git;a=summary
>
> Completely agreed. Al, I remember talking to you about this at the
> storage summit back in february. What are your current plans wrt moving
> this forward?
Rebased, with nfs parts of fmode_t patch taken out (irrelevant for
bdev anyway and really better off in intent-killing queue). Other
than that, it's a straight port... Same place, same branch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists