[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080904131130E.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 13:11:47 +0900
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
To: andi@...stfloor.org
Cc: joerg.roedel@....com, mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
tony.luck@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] swiotlb: fix dma_alloc_coherent allocation failures
with swiotlb
On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 00:09:51 +0200
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com> writes:
>
> > The SWIOTLB version of dma_alloc_coherent allocates all memory with
> > GFP_DMA unconditionally. This leads sometimes unnecessary to allocation
> > failures. This patch makes the allocation strategy to use the DMA32 zone
> > first if this is possible. The changes are boot tested on AMD64 and
> > compile tested for i386 and IA64.
>
> The high level dma_alloc_coherent() does that anyways.
The high level dma_alloc_coherent means the tricks in
arch/x86/pci-dma.c? If so, all the tricks has gone in tip/master.
> The swiotlb fallback really should only allocate from the swiotlb,
> nowhere else.
Agreed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists