[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080904074441.GY18288@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 09:44:41 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc: andi@...stfloor.org, joerg.roedel@....com, mingo@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
tony.luck@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] swiotlb: fix dma_alloc_coherent allocation failures with swiotlb
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 01:11:47PM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 00:09:51 +0200
> Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
>
> > Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com> writes:
> >
> > > The SWIOTLB version of dma_alloc_coherent allocates all memory with
> > > GFP_DMA unconditionally. This leads sometimes unnecessary to allocation
> > > failures. This patch makes the allocation strategy to use the DMA32 zone
> > > first if this is possible. The changes are boot tested on AMD64 and
> > > compile tested for i386 and IA64.
> >
> > The high level dma_alloc_coherent() does that anyways.
>
> The high level dma_alloc_coherent means the tricks in
> arch/x86/pci-dma.c? If so, all the tricks has gone in tip/master.
Seems wrong -- that is something that is needed by multiple
IOMMUs. Pretty much all which work with real memory instead
of virtual mappings.
I also have an older swiotlb rewrite in the pipeline based on the DMA
allocator. The project got a little sidelined, but I hope to eventually
forward port it again.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists