linux-kernel - Re: [RFC patch 0/4] TSC calibration improvements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <116316.1220562057@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date:	Thu, 04 Sep 2008 17:00:57 -0400
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
	Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com>,
	Arjan van de Veen <arjan@...radead.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 0/4] TSC calibration improvements

On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 17:36:20 +0200, Ingo Molnar said:

> i've added them to tip/x86/tsc and merged it into tip/master - if 
> there's test success we can merge it into x86/urgent as well and push it 
> into v2.6.27. Any objections to that merge route?

Timekeeping has always been a snarly issue fraught with peril when testing on
new hardware.  Are we confident enough that this will DTRT on almost every
platform, including all the busticated ones?  Seems dangerous to be merging
it for .27 when we're already past -rc5.

But if Ingo and Thomas want to merge it, it's OK with me as long as they
take the blame for it. :)

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped