[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48C04D0E.8010905@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 23:03:10 +0200
From: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
CC: linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: __kernel_suseconds_t is int on PA-RISC (and SPARC64)?
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Helge Deller wrote:
>> Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> Apparently __kernel_suseconds_t is `int' on PA-RISC (and on SPARC64),
>>> while it's `long' on all other platforms.
>>>
>>> Is there a specific reason for that?
>> I don't know for sure, but arch/parisc/kernel/syscall_table.S states:
>> /* even though manpage says struct timeval contains longs, ours has
>> * time_t and suseconds_t -- both of which are safe wide/narrow */
>> ENTRY_COMP(setitimer)
>>
>> So it was probably chosen to be int so that it can be easily used in 32- and
>> 64bit kernels (or compat code).
>>
>>> This causes compiler warnings in the HP SDC Real Time Clock driver,
>>> which is shared between PA-RISC and m68k:
>
> Here's a patch to fix the compiler warnings. Is this OK for PA-RISC?
>
> SUbject: [PATCH] HP input: kill warnings due to suseconds_t differences
>
> Kill compiler warnings related to printf() formats in the input drivers for
> various HP9000 machines, which are shared between PA-RISC (suseconds_t is int)
> and m68k (suseconds_t is long). As both are 32-bit, it's safe to cast to int.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Thanks Geert.
Tested and OK for PA-RISC.
Acked-by: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
> ---
> drivers/input/misc/hp_sdc_rtc.c | 10 +++++-----
> drivers/input/serio/hp_sdc.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/input/misc/hp_sdc_rtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/hp_sdc_rtc.c
> @@ -458,35 +458,35 @@ static int hp_sdc_rtc_proc_output (char
> p += sprintf(p, "i8042 rtc\t: READ FAILED!\n");
> } else {
> p += sprintf(p, "i8042 rtc\t: %ld.%02d seconds\n",
> - tv.tv_sec, tv.tv_usec/1000);
> + tv.tv_sec, (int)tv.tv_usec/1000);
> }
>
> if (hp_sdc_rtc_read_fhs(&tv)) {
> p += sprintf(p, "handshake\t: READ FAILED!\n");
> } else {
> p += sprintf(p, "handshake\t: %ld.%02d seconds\n",
> - tv.tv_sec, tv.tv_usec/1000);
> + tv.tv_sec, (int)tv.tv_usec/1000);
> }
>
> if (hp_sdc_rtc_read_mt(&tv)) {
> p += sprintf(p, "alarm\t\t: READ FAILED!\n");
> } else {
> p += sprintf(p, "alarm\t\t: %ld.%02d seconds\n",
> - tv.tv_sec, tv.tv_usec/1000);
> + tv.tv_sec, (int)tv.tv_usec/1000);
> }
>
> if (hp_sdc_rtc_read_dt(&tv)) {
> p += sprintf(p, "delay\t\t: READ FAILED!\n");
> } else {
> p += sprintf(p, "delay\t\t: %ld.%02d seconds\n",
> - tv.tv_sec, tv.tv_usec/1000);
> + tv.tv_sec, (int)tv.tv_usec/1000);
> }
>
> if (hp_sdc_rtc_read_ct(&tv)) {
> p += sprintf(p, "periodic\t: READ FAILED!\n");
> } else {
> p += sprintf(p, "periodic\t: %ld.%02d seconds\n",
> - tv.tv_sec, tv.tv_usec/1000);
> + tv.tv_sec, (int)tv.tv_usec/1000);
> }
>
> p += sprintf(p,
> --- a/drivers/input/serio/hp_sdc.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/serio/hp_sdc.c
> @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ static void hp_sdc_tasklet(unsigned long
> * it back to the application. and be less verbose.
> */
> printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX "read timeout (%ius)!\n",
> - tv.tv_usec - hp_sdc.rtv.tv_usec);
> + (int)(tv.tv_usec - hp_sdc.rtv.tv_usec));
> curr->idx += hp_sdc.rqty;
> hp_sdc.rqty = 0;
> tmp = curr->seq[curr->actidx];
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists