[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080905185254.78706060.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 18:52:54 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Hiroshi DOYU <Hiroshi.DOYU@...ia.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tony@...mide.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add missing macro argument for devm_release_* family
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 04:00:23 +0300 Hiroshi DOYU <Hiroshi.DOYU@...ia.com> wrote:
> From: ext Hiroshi DOYU <Hiroshi.DOYU@...ia.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Hiroshi DOYU <Hiroshi.DOYU@...ia.com>
> ---
> include/linux/ioport.h | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/ioport.h b/include/linux/ioport.h
> index 22d2115..c813c63 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ioport.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ioport.h
> @@ -158,9 +158,9 @@ extern struct resource * __devm_request_region(struct device *dev,
> struct resource *parent, resource_size_t start,
> resource_size_t n, const char *name);
>
> -#define devm_release_region(start,n) \
> +#define devm_release_region(dev,start,n) \
> __devm_release_region(dev, &ioport_resource, (start), (n))
> -#define devm_release_mem_region(start,n) \
> +#define devm_release_mem_region(dev,start,n) \
> __devm_release_region(dev, &iomem_resource, (start), (n))
>
> extern void __devm_release_region(struct device *dev, struct resource *parent,
um, OK.
But none of these things appear to have any callers anywhere. Why
don't we just delete it all?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists