[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440809052001o71892669ofe42ee4772654eeb@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 20:01:16 -0700
From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull] x86 fixes (NOPL issue)
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 7:22 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> Please pull:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git x86-fixes-for-linus-2
>
> H. Peter Anvin (4):
> x86: boot: stub out unimplemented CPU feature words
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> index 80ab20d..0785b3c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> #include <asm/mtrr.h>
> #include <asm/mce.h>
> #include <asm/pat.h>
> +#include <asm/asm.h>
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC
> #include <asm/mpspec.h>
> #include <asm/apic.h>
> @@ -341,6 +342,35 @@ static void __init early_cpu_detect(void)
> early_get_cap(c);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * The NOPL instruction is supposed to exist on all CPUs with
> + * family >= 6, unfortunately, that's not true in practice because
> + * of early VIA chips and (more importantly) broken virtualizers that
> + * are not easy to detect. Hence, probe for it based on first
> + * principles.
> + */
if so, should only test on VIA chips.
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists