linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] x86 fixes (NOPL issue)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <48C200F8.90705@shaw.ca>
Date:	Fri, 05 Sep 2008 22:03:04 -0600
From:	Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
CC:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull] x86 fixes (NOPL issue)

Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 7:22 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>> Hi Linus,
>>
>> Please pull:
>>
>>  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git x86-fixes-for-linus-2
>>
>> H. Peter Anvin (4):
>>      x86: boot: stub out unimplemented CPU feature words
>  diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
>> index 80ab20d..0785b3c 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
>> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>>  #include <asm/mtrr.h>
>>  #include <asm/mce.h>
>>  #include <asm/pat.h>
>> +#include <asm/asm.h>
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC
>>  #include <asm/mpspec.h>
>>  #include <asm/apic.h>
>> @@ -341,6 +342,35 @@ static void __init early_cpu_detect(void)
>>        early_get_cap(c);
>>  }
>>
>> +/*
>> + * The NOPL instruction is supposed to exist on all CPUs with
>> + * family >= 6, unfortunately, that's not true in practice because
>> + * of early VIA chips and (more importantly) broken virtualizers that
>> + * are not easy to detect.  Hence, probe for it based on first
>> + * principles.
>> + */
> 
> if so, should only test on VIA chips.

The virtual CPUs are more of a problem. They can't be distinguished from 
the real CPU models they are emulating other than by actually testing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/