lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 07 Sep 2008 17:02:11 -0700
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <>
To:	Yinghai Lu <>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <>,
	Xen Devel <>,
	Andi Kleen <>,,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 7 of 7] x86: always explicitly map acpi memory

Yinghai Lu wrote:
> actually,
> case 1: acpi tables near mmio, range, we don't map them from
> 2.6.27-rc1, and it is bigger than max_low_mapped...
> case 2: some strange system put acpi in the middle of RAM... like when
> 8G ram installed, but MMIO is 3.5G, BIOS put acpi tables around 2G..

OK, so what's your conclusion?  Is this change OK or not?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists