linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] kmemcheck updates for tip/kmemcheck

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <19f34abd0809080824k4dc5e4faq777f7fb3b5fe05fe@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 8 Sep 2008 17:24:28 +0200
From:	"Vegard Nossum" <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
To:	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] kmemcheck updates for tip/kmemcheck

On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> yeah, merges should generally be done in the upstream repo. Obviously
> git-request-pull must list all the commits that happened - it doesnt
> know which commits are 'interesting' or not. I've done an upstream
> merge.
>
> btw., a small build fix (see below) was needed.

Oops. I was being enthusiastic and removed too much.

>
> ---------------->
> From 92a9abb2c571ab8fedaee3537c5667b4e61188ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 16:50:43 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] kmemcheck: build fix
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>
> fix:
>
>  arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/kmemcheck.c: In function 'kmemcheck_init':
>  arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/kmemcheck.c:42: error: 'setup_max_cpus' undeclared (first use in this function)
>  arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/kmemcheck.c:42: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
>  arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/kmemcheck.c:42: error: for each function it appears in.)
>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> ---
>  arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/kmemcheck.c |    2 ++
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/kmemcheck.c b/arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/kmemcheck.c
> index eef8c6a..75831f0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/kmemcheck.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/kmemcheck.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ void __init kmemcheck_init(void)
>  {
>        printk(KERN_INFO "kmemcheck: \"Bugs, beware!\"\n");
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && !defined(CONFIG_KMEMCHECK_USE_SMP)

Should really be just:

+#if defined(CONFIG_SMP)

Can you amend?

Thanks a lot,


Vegard

-- 
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
	-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/