linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] kmemcheck updates for tip/kmemcheck

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <19f34abd0809080826s758a212x22f17e1836e27e2@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 8 Sep 2008 17:26:25 +0200
From:	"Vegard Nossum" <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
To:	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] kmemcheck updates for tip/kmemcheck

On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && !defined(CONFIG_KMEMCHECK_USE_SMP)
>
> Should really be just:
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SMP)
>
> Can you amend?

Er, also written like:

+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP

Bonk.


Vegard

-- 
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
	-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/