linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] smp: reduce stack requirements for smp_call_function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:51:53 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	nickpiggin@...oo.com.au
Cc:	travis@....com, mingo@...e.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	steiner@....com, jes@....com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] smp: reduce stack requirements for
 smp_call_function_mask

From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 20:30:41 +1000

> Is that being tried? Setting it to 8192 or even higher during QA seems
> like a good idea to me.

This is a great idea, especially since it will make it even more
painfully obvious that essentially any function local cpumask_t
variable is a bug.

Really, it seems sensible to do something like:

1) Make cpumask_t a pointer.

2) Add cpumask_data_t which is what cpumask_t is now.  This gets
   used when for the actual storage, and will only get applied to
   datastructures that are dynamically allocated.  For example, for
   the cpu_vm_mask in mm_struct.

3) Type make and fix build failures until they are all gone.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/