[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080908125525.72bc1ad2@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 12:55:25 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull] x86 fixes
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 12:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> I think there are realistically three classes:
>
> - _really_ old, to the point of being totally useless for SMP.
>
> This is really just 386 and clones. We _need_ a working WP for a
> race-free access_ok(), and we need cmpxchg (and lately xadd).
>
> Smaller pains even on UP: bswap doesn't exist. invlpg doesn't
> exist.
I'd lump all cpus that don't have cpuid in this bucket too (eg half the
486es) simply because not having cpuid is painful in pretty much the
same way.
> - old. pre-cmov. i486 and pentium, and some clones.
makes sense
> - "modern 32-bit": PPro and better. Can take CMOV, MMX and TSC for
> granted.
again makes sense; question is if it makes sense to take PSE and PAE
for granted as well (although PSE we can do runtime I suppose)
> Hmm? Doesn't that sound like a sane model?
it does to me; the only question is if we hit a new bucket with the
various fancy string instructions that are in upcoming models; doing
string/copy operations inlined for those guys will make a fourth bucket.
--
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@...ux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists