[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080908.164427.216880550.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 16:44:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: david-b@...bell.net
Cc: James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
alessandro.zummo@...ertech.it
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix RTC_CLASS regression with PARISC
From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 16:29:20 -0700
> That said, there's a bit of unresolved stuff around NTP hooks
> in the kernel. Some patches are pending to let thtem work with
> the RTC framework -- where writing an RTC may need to sleep,
> for example because the RTC is on an I2C or SPI bus. And
> then there's the discussion of whether that shouldn't all be
> handled by NTPD anyway, no special kernel support desired.
> Alessandro has opinions there. ;)
My update_persistent_clock() on sparc64 is:
int update_persistent_clock(struct timespec now)
{
struct rtc_device *rtc = rtc_class_open("rtc0");
if (rtc)
return rtc_set_mmss(rtc, now.tv_sec);
return -1;
}
and that should handle this NTP shouldn't it?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists