linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fix RTC_CLASS regression with PARISC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 8 Sep 2008 17:55:25 -0700
From:	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
	alessandro.zummo@...ertech.it
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix RTC_CLASS regression with PARISC

On Monday 08 September 2008, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
> Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 16:29:20 -0700
> 
> > That said, there's a bit of unresolved stuff around NTP hooks
> > in the kernel.  Some patches are pending to let thtem work with
> > the RTC framework -- where writing an RTC may need to sleep,
> > for example because the RTC is on an I2C or SPI bus.  And
> > then there's the discussion of whether that shouldn't all be
> > handled by NTPD anyway, no special kernel support desired.
> > Alessandro has opinions there.  ;)
> 
> My update_persistent_clock() on sparc64 is:
> 
> int update_persistent_clock(struct timespec now)
> {
> 	struct rtc_device *rtc = rtc_class_open("rtc0");

I'd be tempted to cache that ... notice how you never
close it, too.  That will goof lots of refcounts...


> 	if (rtc)
> 		return rtc_set_mmss(rtc, now.tv_sec);
> 
> 	return -1;
> }
> 
> and that should handle this NTP shouldn't it?

Depends on what patches have applied; I've lost track
of whether it's now ok for update_persistent_clock()
to sleep.  Previously it was not, without a critical
patch (appended).

Having something like that work is *certainly* a goal,
at least for those who don't want to get rid of those
kernel NTP hooks entirely.

And of course, once that works I'd claim it should live
in drivers/rtc for the benefit of other platforms.  :)

- Dave
 
=============== CUT ON THE DOTTED LINE ==================
Subject: ntp: let update_persistent_clock() sleep
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>

This is a change that makes the 11-minute RTC update be run in the process
context.  This is so that update_persistent_clock() can sleep, which may
be required for certain types of RTC hardware -- most notably I2C devices.

Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@...ux-mips.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>
Cc: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
---
 kernel/time/ntp.c |   12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/time/ntp.c	2008-06-30 21:20:51.000000000 -0700
+++ b/kernel/time/ntp.c	2008-06-30 21:21:27.000000000 -0700
@@ -10,13 +10,13 @@
 
 #include <linux/mm.h>
 #include <linux/time.h>
-#include <linux/timer.h>
 #include <linux/timex.h>
 #include <linux/jiffies.h>
 #include <linux/hrtimer.h>
 #include <linux/capability.h>
 #include <linux/math64.h>
 #include <linux/clocksource.h>
+#include <linux/workqueue.h>
 #include <asm/timex.h>
 
 /*
@@ -218,11 +218,11 @@ void second_overflow(void)
 /* Disable the cmos update - used by virtualization and embedded */
 int no_sync_cmos_clock  __read_mostly;
 
-static void sync_cmos_clock(unsigned long dummy);
+static void sync_cmos_clock(struct work_struct *work);
 
-static DEFINE_TIMER(sync_cmos_timer, sync_cmos_clock, 0, 0);
+static DECLARE_DELAYED_WORK(sync_cmos_work, sync_cmos_clock);
 
-static void sync_cmos_clock(unsigned long dummy)
+static void sync_cmos_clock(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	struct timespec now, next;
 	int fail = 1;
@@ -258,13 +258,13 @@ static void sync_cmos_clock(unsigned lon
 		next.tv_sec++;
 		next.tv_nsec -= NSEC_PER_SEC;
 	}
-	mod_timer(&sync_cmos_timer, jiffies + timespec_to_jiffies(&next));
+	schedule_delayed_work(&sync_cmos_work, timespec_to_jiffies(&next));
 }
 
 static void notify_cmos_timer(void)
 {
 	if (!no_sync_cmos_clock)
-		mod_timer(&sync_cmos_timer, jiffies + 1);
+		schedule_delayed_work(&sync_cmos_work, 0);
 }
 
 #else

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/