| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <12208705552047-git-send-email-sheng.yang@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 18:42:35 +0800
From: Sheng Yang <sheng.yang@...el.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sheng Yang <sheng.yang@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] x86: Add "virt flags" in /proc/cpuinfo
The hardware virtualization technology evolves very fast. But currently
it's hard to tell if your CPU support a certain kind of HW technology
without digging into the source code.
The patch add a new item under /proc/cpuinfo, named "virt flags". The "virt
flags" got the similar purpose as "flags". It is used to indicate what
HW virtulization features does this CPU supported, and it don't cover all
features but only the important ones.
Current implementation just cover Intel VMX side.
Signed-off-by: Sheng Yang <sheng.yang@...el.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/asm-x86/cpufeature.h | 8 ++++++++
2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
index a26c480..737a1bd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
@@ -77,6 +77,31 @@ static void show_cpuinfo_misc(struct seq_file *m, struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
}
#endif
+static void show_cpuinfo_vmx_virtflags(struct seq_file *m)
+{
+ u32 vmx_msr_low, vmx_msr_high, msr_ctl, msr_ctl2;
+
+ seq_printf(m, "\nvirt flags\t:");
+ rdmsr(MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS, vmx_msr_low, vmx_msr_high);
+ msr_ctl = vmx_msr_high | vmx_msr_low;
+ if (msr_ctl & X86_VMX_FEATURE_PROC_CTLS_TPR_SHADOW)
+ seq_printf(m, " tpr_shadow");
+ if (msr_ctl & X86_VMX_FEATURE_PROC_CTLS_VNMI)
+ seq_printf(m, " vnmi");
+ if (msr_ctl & X86_VMX_FEATURE_PROC_CTLS_2ND_CTLS) {
+ rdmsr(MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS2,
+ vmx_msr_low, vmx_msr_high);
+ msr_ctl2 = vmx_msr_high | vmx_msr_low;
+ if ((msr_ctl2 & X86_VMX_FEATURE_PROC_CTLS2_VIRT_APIC) &&
+ (msr_ctl & X86_VMX_FEATURE_PROC_CTLS_TPR_SHADOW))
+ seq_printf(m, " flexpriority");
+ if (msr_ctl2 & X86_VMX_FEATURE_PROC_CTLS2_EPT)
+ seq_printf(m, " ept");
+ if (msr_ctl2 & X86_VMX_FEATURE_PROC_CTLS2_VPID)
+ seq_printf(m, " vpid");
+ }
+}
+
static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
{
struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = v;
@@ -123,6 +148,9 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
if (cpu_has(c, i) && x86_cap_flags[i] != NULL)
seq_printf(m, " %s", x86_cap_flags[i]);
+ if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_VMX))
+ show_cpuinfo_vmx_virtflags(m);
+
seq_printf(m, "\nbogomips\t: %lu.%02lu\n",
c->loops_per_jiffy/(500000/HZ),
(c->loops_per_jiffy/(5000/HZ)) % 100);
diff --git a/include/asm-x86/cpufeature.h b/include/asm-x86/cpufeature.h
index 7ac4d93..b5e4aef 100644
--- a/include/asm-x86/cpufeature.h
+++ b/include/asm-x86/cpufeature.h
@@ -150,6 +150,14 @@
*/
#define X86_FEATURE_IDA (7*32+ 0) /* Intel Dynamic Acceleration */
+/* Intel VMX MSR indicated features */
+#define X86_VMX_FEATURE_PROC_CTLS_TPR_SHADOW 0x00200000
+#define X86_VMX_FEATURE_PROC_CTLS_VNMI 0x00400000
+#define X86_VMX_FEATURE_PROC_CTLS_2ND_CTLS 0x80000000
+#define X86_VMX_FEATURE_PROC_CTLS2_VIRT_APIC 0x00000001
+#define X86_VMX_FEATURE_PROC_CTLS2_EPT 0x00000002
+#define X86_VMX_FEATURE_PROC_CTLS2_VPID 0x00000020
+
#if defined(__KERNEL__) && !defined(__ASSEMBLY__)
#include <linux/bitops.h>
--
1.5.4.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists