lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <12208705553277-git-send-email-sheng.yang@intel.com>
Date:	Mon,  8 Sep 2008 18:42:33 +0800
From:	Sheng Yang <sheng.yang@...el.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Sheng Yang <sheng.yang@...el.com>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] x86: Add "virt flags"

Hi, Ingo

(sorry for former noises, I mistake the address... Report to lkml)
I've sent this patchset before, but got no comments from upstream at that
time.  So I'd like to resend this.

The virt flags is used for the important hardware virtualization features,
like EPT of incoming Nehalem. Because the feature availability are read from
MSRs, and I think virtualization features should not at the same level as
"vmx", so I added a new flags catagory here.

But I still have concern, for this may broke some not that reliable userspace
programs. So Avi suggested that we can add more fields to flags rather than a
new catagory.  What's your opinion? We indeed need a generic user visible way
to tell the HW virtualization features.

Thanks!
--
regards
Yang, Sheng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ