linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] 24-bit types: typedef and functions for accessing 3-byte arrays as integers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:57:12 +0300
From:	Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
To:	Chris Leech <christopher.leech@...el.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 24-bit types: typedef and functions for accessing 3-byte
 arrays as integers

Chris Leech wrote:
> Both iSCSI and Fibre Channel make use of 24-bit big-endian values in
> frame headers.  This patch defines __be24 and __le24 typedefs for a
> structure wrapped around a 3-byte array, and functions to convert back and
> forth to a 32-bit integer.
> 
> The undefs in iscsi_proto.h are because of the different calling
> convention for the existing hton24 macro in the iSCSI code.  iSCSI will
> be converted in a subsequent patch.
> 
> Changes from last posting:
> 
> Switched from preprocessor macros to inline functions.  The generated assembly
> is the same with gcc 4.1.2 as long as the function is actually inlined.  I
> applied the __always_inline attribute to all of these, after seeing that with
> one of my test kernel configurations they were not being inlined without it
> and the generated instructions in the iSCSI code could be considered a
> regression from the existing macro.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Leech <christopher.leech@...el.com>
> ---
> 
>  include/linux/byteorder.h         |   44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/byteorder/generic.h |   45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/types.h             |    2 ++
>  include/scsi/iscsi_proto.h        |    2 ++
>  4 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
<snip>

Thanks! Personally I like this much better.

Sorry to be nit picking but again I hate that double implementation thing.
>From what I could see, and considering a few of the ARCHs you mentioned,
it looks to me like <linux/swab.h> is common to the two implementations,
(old and new). Perhaps put the "__xxx" implementations in swab.h and
only the xxx => __xxx switching in the double byteorder headers, which
fits better with the surrounding style of these headers. 

Thanks
Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/