linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] include <linux/types.h> into linux/dlm_plock.h for _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080910125503.GG3757@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:55:04 +0300
From:	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Christine Caulfield <caulfie@...hat.com>,
	David Teigland <teigland@...hat.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] include <linux/types.h> into linux/dlm_plock.h for
	__u* typedef

On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 04:14:50PM +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 02:22:04PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > --- a/include/linux/dlm_plock.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/dlm_plock.h
> 
> > +#include <linux/types.h>
> 
> I'd say that unless you can demonstrate compilation breakage, these will
> only slow down compilation.

Do you think that minor slow down is worse than dependence on the order of
inclusion?

-- 
Regards,  Kirill A. Shutemov
 + Belarus, Minsk
 + ALT Linux Team, http://www.altlinux.com/

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)