[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48C80C11.9080103@panasas.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 21:04:01 +0300
From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
To: Chris Leech <christopher.leech@...el.com>
CC: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Open-FCoE] [PATCH 1/3] 24-bit types: typedef and macros for
accessing 3-byte arrays as integers
Chris Leech wrote:
> Chris Leech wrote:
>> Dave Kleikamp wrote:
>>> @@ -62,7 +60,7 @@ struct timestruc_t {
>>> */
>>> typedef struct {
>>> unsigned len:24;
>>> - unsigned off1:8;
>>> + u8 off1;
>>> u32 off2;
>>> } lxd_t;
>> Shouldn't len here be changed to a __le24? I think this just changed
>> the size of lxd_t by a byte.
>
> Never mind, I see that it's a host order field. And presently surprised
> to see that gcc combines the 24-bit bitfield with the following u8.
>
> Chris
It does because these are all bytes. on x86. But this is not guarantied
for all ARCHs and machine-word-sizes. In any way this should be consistent
with the rest of the file.
Please see my other reply about packing of structures. If this is
on-the-wire then there are problems.
Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists