[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aday71zn8qd.fsf@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:42:18 -0700
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
To: "Zhao\, Yu" <yu.zhao@...el.com>
Cc: "Alex Chiang" <achiang@...com>,
"Jesse Barnes" <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"Randy Dunlap" <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
"Greg KH" <greg@...ah.com>,
"Grant Grundler" <grundler@...isc-linux.org>,
"Matthew Wilcox" <matthew@....cx>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
<xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4 v2] PCI: support ARI capability
> ARI is an independent PCI Express extended capability. Multi-function
> devices supporting this capability may use it to track dependency
> between different functions and assign function group numbers to
> these functions.
> Another reason to keep this separated with SR-IOV is that after ARI
> is enabled, PCI Express Endpoint may have non-zero slot number
> (device number), which is different from traditional PCI Express
> Endpoint.
OK, I guess. Although I still don't see why we need a user-visible
option to control ARI independent of SR-IOV. When would a user want to
enable CONFIG_PCI_ARI=y but not select CONFIG_PCI_IOV? (Also, by the
way, why PCI_IOV instead of PCI_SR_IOV -- I assume in the future we may
have PCI_MR_IOV, and matching the PCI terminology is probably easier for
people to understand).
- R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists