[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080910200721.GI2772@parisc-linux.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:07:21 -0600
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To: "Zhao, Yu" <yu.zhao@...el.com>
Cc: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>, Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Grant Grundler <grundler@...isc-linux.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4 v2] PCI: support ARI capability
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 03:48:04PM +0800, Zhao, Yu wrote:
> >I agree with this improvement to the help text. But a further question
> >is whether ARI even merits its own user-visible config option. Is it
> >worth having yet another choice for users? When would someone want ARI
> >but not SR-IOV?
>
> ARI is an independent PCI Express extended capability. Multi-function devices supporting this capability may use it to track dependency between different functions and assign function group numbers to these functions.
>
> Another reason to keep this separated with SR-IOV is that after ARI is enabled, PCI Express Endpoint may have non-zero slot number (device number), which is different from traditional PCI Express Endpoint.
Let me ask the question slightly differently: Why would someone want to
turn the capability off? Is it just to save a few hundred bytes in the
kernel image, or is there some hardware that won't work? Or some other
reason I haven't thought of?
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists