[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0809151934040.23817@mtfhpc.demon.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 19:51:12 +0100 (BST)
From: Mark Fortescue <mark@...hpc.demon.co.uk>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
joy@...uzijast.net
Subject: Re: Allow 8250 to work on sparc.
Hi Alan,
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008, Alan Cox wrote:
>> At the user level, there is no difference between a sun zilog serial port,
>> an 8250 serial port or a USB serial port so these should be allocated
>> using the same allocation system.
>
> That isn't strictly true.
I am intrigued. Other than the valid baud rates what differences are
visible at the user level?
>
>> For me, it would also simplify the issue of trying to work what devive to
>> look for when I plug in a new USB serial port device. It would be the new
>> /dev/ttyS<x> to appear in /dev.
>
> Naming is a private matter for udev anyway, independant of numbering for
> major/minor
>
Yes, but I have not found a simple way to configure it to add serial port
devices to the next available /dev/ttyS<xx>. If this was the default, it
would be much easier for me :). (I am assuming that all the different
serial port devices I use are transparent at the user level, hence my
question above.)
Regards
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists