linux-kernel - Re: Allow 8250 to work on sparc.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080915.115143.62965548.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 15 Sep 2008 11:51:43 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Cc:	mark@...hpc.demon.co.uk, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
	joy@...uzijast.net
Subject: Re: Allow 8250 to work on sparc.

From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 17:22:11 +0100

> > At the user level, there is no difference between a sun zilog serial port, 
> > an 8250 serial port or a USB serial port so these should be allocated 
> > using the same allocation system.
> 
> That isn't strictly true.
> 
> > For me, it would also simplify the issue of trying to work what devive to 
> > look for when I plug in a new USB serial port device. It would be the new 
> > /dev/ttyS<x> to appear in /dev.
> 
> Naming is a private matter for udev anyway, independant of numbering for
> major/minor

True.  But I think there is some merit in having such a generic
allocator for the current users of the ttySX minor space.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/