[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080817195103.GD4043@ucw.cz>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 21:51:03 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
To: Elias Oltmanns <eo@...ensachen.de>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Shem Multinymous <multinymous@...il.com>,
Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Laptop shock detection and harddisk protection
Hi!
> Short of a satisfying proposition regarding the questions raised, I just
> want to add two things that would be nice to solve in the future one way
> or another and should perhaps be taken into consideration from the
> beginning:
>
> 1. Disable polling completely when it isn't required: once the hd has
> spun down, there is no need to keep polling the sensors at all. Only
> when the first request requiring the hd to spin up arrives, the
> kernel needs to hold back for a short while to gather enough data
> from the sensors, so shock protection is up and running again.
hdparm can already tell if disk is spinning or not. As userland is
polling, already, that may be enough?
> 2. Make shock protection interact nicely with suspend operations:
> currently, we are out of luck if anything should happen after
> processes have been frozen. This is particularly unfortunatel in the
> case of s2disk.
I'd say that s2disk is similar to early boot... no protection there.
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists