[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200809171626.28782.mb@bu3sch.de>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 16:26:28 +0200
From: Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
Cc: Carlos Corbacho <carlos@...angeworlds.co.uk>,
bcm43xx-dev@...ts.berlios.de,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
Adel Gadllah <adel.gadllah@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Regression in 2.6.27-rcX caused by commit bc19d6e0b74ef03a3baf035412c95192b54dfc6f
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 00:37:29 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Michael Buesch wrote:
> > But I don't know how to tell the rfkill subsystem about the states and
>
> rfkill_force_state(). Must NOT be called from within atomic contextes,
> something I haven't got around to find a proper way of fixing, and nobody
> else seems to be on a rfkill coding frenzy right now.
That's a showstopper for us, as we have to change the state from
within an interrupt tasklet.
> I won't go on the rfkill-allocate/-free stuff, messing with that API means
> you need to fix a lot of other people's drivers. But you have the
> rfkill-hw-state-changed now, it is called rfkill_force_state(). The only
> crap is that it cannot be called from atomic contexts.
Yeah well. I didn't know. I lost interest in rfkill pretty much when it
stopped blowing up (until it started again when somebody merged a patch
recently).
--
Greetings Michael.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists