[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200809171628.05689.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 16:28:05 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] pci: using printk(KERN_PCI v3
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 02:27:44 am Yinghai Lu wrote:
> v2: use printk(KERN_DEBUG KERN_PCI ...
> v3: fix checkpatch error and warning
>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
>
> ---
> drivers/pci/probe.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/pci/probe.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -304,7 +304,8 @@ static int __pci_read_base(struct pci_de
> } else {
> res->start = l64;
> res->end = l64 + sz64;
> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "PCI: %s reg %x 64bit mmio: [%llx, %llx]\n",
> + printk(KERN_DEBUG KERN_PCI
> + "PCI: %s reg %x 64bit mmio: [%llx, %llx]\n",
> pci_name(dev), pos, res->start, res->end);
I really don't understand the point of this series. I think
the user experience is too confusing.
But if you're going to change printks like the one above,
please at least make it use dev_printk() like most of the
rest of the PCI core.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists