[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48D184CC.2040204@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 23:29:32 +0100
From: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@...oo.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
peterz@...radead.org
Subject: Re: How how latent should non-preemptive scheduling be?
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:48:55 +0100
> Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@...oo.com> wrote:
>
>> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>>> this says you haven't done "make install" on the latencytop
>>> directory so it's not translating things for you.. can you do that
>>> please?
>>> Cause Maximum
>>>
> Percentage
>
> Scheduler: waiting for cpu 208 msec 59.4 %
>
>
> you're rather CPU bound, and your process was woken up but didn't run for over 200 milliseconds..
> that sounds like a scheduler fairness issue!
I'm at a bit of a loss to explain this. I'm not using the group
scheduler and the load average is less than 0.4. CPU usage does seem to
spike a fair bit (I'm not sure why rhythmbox needs 50%+ for decoding
oggs from time to time) but there always seems to be 20% CPU free...
I don't know where to start debugging this one and I'm suspicious of the
way the problem would happen every 30 seconds too... (this laptop is
using ath5k for its wifi)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists