[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080917083809.GB24035@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 10:38:09 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] x86: add KERN_APIC
* Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
> and kill apic_printk
> using loglevel=apic:8 instead
yes, that aspect is very nice.
> +DEFINE_LOGLEVEL_SETUP_DEF(apic, KERN_APIC, "apic:", 6);
> - printk(KERN_WARNING "APIC calibration not consistent "
> + printk(KERN_WARNING KERN_APIC "APIC calibration not consistent "
here too the question arises: what should the semantics of the 'mixing'
of such subsystem printk tags with the classic priority tags be. I think
in this particular case we dont want the KERN_APIC tag, as that would
prevent this failure message to be printed by default. I.e. this line
should remain:
> - printk(KERN_WARNING "APIC calibration not consistent "
to make sure this warning always shows up in the logs. Agreed?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists