[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080922163914.2cafd797@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:39:14 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: "Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] corruption check: run the corruption checks from a
work queue
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:28:23 -0700 (PDT)
"Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@...otime.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> > eh a stray debug // snuck in; update attached
>
> In that case, patch 1/2 contains "for(" and "while(". :(
>
that's a dillema case.
I'm just moving code around in patch 1/2; I personally consider it bad
form to also change it at the same time.....
(and it confuses git change tracking)
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists