[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080923011908.GC25045@linux-os.sc.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:19:08 -0700
From: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip/master] x86: io-apic - interrupt remapping fix
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 03:37:36AM -0700, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> [Ingo Molnar - Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 12:05:32PM +0200]
> |
> | * Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
> |
> | > On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 2:04 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> | >
> | > BTW
> | >
> | > x2apic and IRmapping make io_apic.c and apic.c ugly.
> |
> | yes. Any ideas how to clean it up some more?
> |
> | the kmalloc looks quite ugly, especially with this kfree() teardown
> | sequence we have now.
> |
> | Ingo
> |
>
> yes Ingo - it's ugly but I had not that many choises:
>
> 1) allocate/deallocate if failed inside same routine
> 2) deallocate in restore_IO_APIC_setup (which would be much more
> ugly and obscure)
> 3) allocate and deallocate in completely separated routines - didn't
> even tried :)
>
> So I've stopped on (1) 'case it was less_changing_the_sources patch.
I think Yinghai is complaing about other code aswell (HAVE_X2APIC etc).
Probably I should move some of the x2apic/interrupt-remapping code
setup out of io_apic.c and apic.c to a common file.
thanks,
suresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists