[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080923012015.GD1814@ldl.fc.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 19:20:15 -0600
From: Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org, kristen.c.accardi@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/13] PCI: cpqphp: stop managing hotplug_slot->name
* Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 04:00:32AM -0600, Alex Chiang wrote:
> > -static inline void make_slot_name(char *buffer, int buffer_size, struct slot *slot)
> > -{
> > - snprintf(buffer, buffer_size, "%d", slot->number);
> > -}
>
> > +
> > + scnprintf(name, SLOT_NAME_SIZE, "%d", slot->number);
>
> So ... we're using %d here and %u in acpiphp. Obviously we don't expect
> to get a number above 2 billion, but I think if we do have some utterly
> bogus firmware that gives us a number above 2 billion, printing a
> positive number is a better user experience than a negative number.
Well, on some HP machines, a slot number >2 billion actually does
make sense, if you convert it to hex, and then consider that to
be some sort of encoding for topology.
But your point here stands, I can change this driver to a %u.
> We clearly have a common pattern here where hotplug drivers have a
> number insteaqd of a name (I would venture this is the most common).
> Maybe we need a common helper? I think this is a subject for the
> long-term todo list, not something that needs to be addressed in the
> context of this patch series.
Yeah, ok -- long term todo. ;)
/ac
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists