linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: do_generic_file_read() never gets a NULL 'filp' argument

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 23 Sep 2008 20:00:51 +0900 (JST)
From:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@...ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: do_generic_file_read() never gets a NULL 'filp' argument

Hi Andrew,

> > > > The 'filp' argument to do_generic_file_read() is never NULL.
> > > 
> > > How did you verify this?
> > > 
> > > NFS used to like passing NULL file*'s into VFS functions.  I don't
> > > recall whether it affected do_generic_file_read().
> > 
> > The only thing nfsd passed a NULL file pointer in is ->fsync on
> > directories.
> 
> NFS, not NFSD.  It was page_cache_read(), iirc.

Is it important?
Cristoph wrote following decision reason at last mail.
I believe he was right.

> If anyone did pass a NULL file pointer into
> do_generic_file_read it would oops in it's very first line of code.


IOW, do_generic_file_read() has following calling hieralcy.

generic_file_aio_read()
  +- do_generic_file_read()

and fs/nfs/file.c has

	const struct file_operations nfs_file_operations = {
	        .llseek         = nfs_file_llseek,
	        .read           = do_sync_read,
	        .write          = do_sync_write,
	        .aio_read       = nfs_file_read,
	        .aio_write      = nfs_file_write,

So, nfs doesn't use generic_file_aio_read.
it directly indicate nfs doesn't use do_generic_file_read().

in the other hand, page_cache_read() has following calling hieralcy.

filemap_fault()
  +- page_cache_read()
      +- a_ops->readpage()

So, page_cache_read is mmap() related helper function and
do_generic_file_read is read() related helper function.
they are independent IMHO.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/