[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.1.10.0809240715340.31367@tundra.namei.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 07:20:01 +1000 (EST)
From: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>, david@...g.hm,
Kentaro Takeda <takedakn@...data.co.jp>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Toshiharu Harada <haradats@...data.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introduce new LSM hooks where vfsmount is available.
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > > > I don't see any technical errors in this patch.
> > > >
> > > > If it is going to be merged, please make a new config option for
> > > > path-based hooks (similar to that for the network hooks), so they can be
> > > > compiled out.
>
> Another pointless config option.
Why is it pointless? If distros don't want to use these hooks, they
shouldn't have to have them enabled.
>
> It's actually pretty surprising that SECURITY_NETWORK is
> a) user-visible and b) is not SECURITY && NET.
>
> Same for SECURITY_NETWORK_XFRM.
IIRC, this option was a perquisite for merge. Networking hooks have a
relatively high overhead and not everyone wants to use them, even if they
have networking enabled.
- James
--
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists