linux-kernel - Re: [Patch -tip] x86/ftrace: use uaccess in atomic context

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0809241030460.31061@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Wed, 24 Sep 2008 10:31:28 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch -tip] x86/ftrace: use uaccess in atomic context


On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Fr?d?ric Weisbecker wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> With last -tip I get this bug:
> 
> [   49.439988] in_atomic():0, irqs_disabled():1
> [   49.440118] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
> [   49.440118] Pid: 2814, comm: modprobe Tainted: G        W 2.6.27-rc7 #4
> [   49.440118]  [<c01215e1>] __might_sleep+0xe1/0x120
> [   49.440118]  [<c01148ea>] ftrace_modify_code+0x2a/0xd0
> [   49.440118]  [<c01148a2>] ? ftrace_test_p6nop+0x0/0xa
> [   49.440118]  [<c016e80e>] __ftrace_update_code+0xfe/0x2f0
> [   49.440118]  [<c01148a2>] ? ftrace_test_p6nop+0x0/0xa
> [   49.440118]  [<c016f190>] ftrace_convert_nops+0x50/0x80
> [   49.440118]  [<c016f1d6>] ftrace_init_module+0x16/0x20
> [   49.440118]  [<c015498b>] load_module+0x185b/0x1d30
> [   49.440118]  [<c01767a0>] ? find_get_page+0x0/0xf0
> [   49.440118]  [<c02463c0>] ? sprintf+0x0/0x30
> [   49.440118]  [<c034e012>] ? mutex_lock_interruptible_nested+0x1f2/0x350
> [   49.440118]  [<c0154eb3>] sys_init_module+0x53/0x1b0
> [   49.440118]  [<c0352340>] ? do_page_fault+0x0/0x740
> [   49.440118]  [<c0104012>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
> [   49.440118]  =======================
> 
> It is because ftrace_modify_code() calls copy_to_user and 
> copy_from_user.
> These functions have been inserted after guessing that there 
> couldn't be any race condition but copy_[to/from]_user might 
> sleep and __ftrace_update_code is called with local_irq_saved.
> 
> These function have been inserted since this commit:
> d5e92e8978fd2574e415dc2792c5eb592978243d: 
> "ftrace: x86 use copy from user function"
> 
> Following is a patch which correct it.
> ---
> Adapt uaccess functions's use to atomic context in ftrace_modify_code()
> since we are in IRQ-off context: __ftrace_update_code() calls
> local_irq_save().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> ---

I had this exact patch sitting it my quilt queue. I thought I sent it out, 
but it must have been lost in the noise.

Thanks,

Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/