[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1222368047.15523.81.camel@nimitz>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:40:47 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
"xemul@...nvz.org" <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>, ryov@...inux.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/12] memcg allocate all page_cgroup at boot
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 15:32 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> @@ -949,6 +953,11 @@ struct mem_section {
>
> /* See declaration of similar field in struct zone */
> unsigned long *pageblock_flags;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
> + /* see page_cgroup.h */
> + struct page_cgroup *page_cgroup;
> + unsigned long pad;
> +#endif
> };
I thought the use of this variable was under the
+#ifdef CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP
options. Otherwise, we unconditionally bloat mem_section, right?
-- Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists