[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080926101754.91e64254.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 10:17:54 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
"xemul@...nvz.org" <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>, ryov@...inux.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/12] memcg allocate all page_cgroup at boot
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:40:47 -0700
Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 15:32 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > @@ -949,6 +953,11 @@ struct mem_section {
> >
> > /* See declaration of similar field in struct zone */
> > unsigned long *pageblock_flags;
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
> > + /* see page_cgroup.h */
> > + struct page_cgroup *page_cgroup;
> > + unsigned long pad;
> > +#endif
> > };
>
> I thought the use of this variable was under the
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP
>
> options. Otherwise, we unconditionally bloat mem_section, right?
>
Hmmm......Oh, yes ! nice catch.
Thanks, I'll fix.
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists