linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 9/12] memcg allocate all page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 26 Sep 2008 10:22:43 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
	"xemul@...nvz.org" <xemul@...nvz.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>, ryov@...inux.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/12] memcg allocate all page_cgroup at boot

On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 10:17:54 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:40:47 -0700
> Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 15:32 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > > @@ -949,6 +953,11 @@ struct mem_section {
> > > 
> > >         /* See declaration of similar field in struct zone */
> > >         unsigned long *pageblock_flags;
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
> > > +       /* see page_cgroup.h */
> > > +       struct page_cgroup *page_cgroup;
> > > +       unsigned long pad;
> > > +#endif
> > >  };
> > 
> > I thought the use of this variable was under the
> > 
> > 	+#ifdef CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP
> > 
> > options.  Otherwise, we unconditionally bloat mem_section, right?
> > 
> Hmmm......Oh, yes ! nice catch.
> 
> Thanks, I'll fix.

But in reality, this is under CONFIG_SPARSEMEM and if CONFIG_SPARSEMEM,
FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP is not true (I think).
Hmm..Maybe I shouldn't use checking CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP and should
just use CONFIG_SPARSEMEM check. I'll rewrite.

Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/