[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48DBDC92.80605@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:46:42 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
CC: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>, airlied@...il.com,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, david.vrabel@....com, rjw@...k.pl,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org,
chrisl@...are.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org, jesse.brandeburg@...il.com
Subject: Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM
Jiri Kosina wrote:
>
> Yes, I think that xorg/xorg i915 driver/libdrm/GEM/whatever are the
> biggest suspect currently, according to the data that has been gathered so
> far.
>
> Still, what confuses me a little bit -- the EEPROM of the card is set to
> all 0xff, once the corruption happens. Isn't that a quite a coincidence,
> that bytes representing "nothing" in this context are used?
>
Typical card EEPROMs are serial - either I2C or SPI. I believe the
Intel cards use SPI EEPROMs, but I'm not sure.
[Disclaimer: I don't actually know SPI all that well; I know I2C better.
However, I'm pretty sure the following argument does apply to both.]
Consider a corruption which turns a read command into a write command --
often just a single bit difference. Now, the EEPROM will expect data in
to write, but nothing will be driving the data line, so it will
typically be a 1. As the host tries to read, it will therefore fill the
EEPROM with all ones.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists