linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/12] memcg avoid accounting special mappings not on LRU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080926181726.359c77a8.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Fri, 26 Sep 2008 18:17:26 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
	"xemul@...nvz.org" <xemul@...nvz.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>, ryov@...inux.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/12] memcg avoid accounting special mappings not on LRU

On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 13:55:54 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > There are not-on-LRU pages which can be mapped and they are not worth to
> > be accounted. (becasue we can't shrink them and need dirty codes to handle
> > specical case) We'd like to make use of usual objrmap/radix-tree's protcol
> > and don't want to account out-of-vm's control pages.
> > 
> > When special_mapping_fault() is called, page->mapping is tend to be NULL 
> > and it's charged as Anonymous page.
> > insert_page() also handles some special pages from drivers.
> > 
> > This patch is for avoiding to account special pages.
> > 
> 
> Hmm... I am a little concerned that with these changes actual usage will much
> more than what we report in memory.usage_in_bytes. Why not move them to
> non-reclaimable LRU list as unevictable pages (once those patches go in, we can
> push this as well). 

Because they are not on LRU ...i.e. !PageLRU(page)

> I suspect the size of special pages is too short to affect
> anything or are you seeing something very different?

I don't want put pages never goes to LRU onto memcgroup's LRU.

Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/